![]() It allows them to have a certain number of first-year spots filled. They also offer a smaller boost in acceptance rates.īut colleges are the big beneficiaries of this scheme. But these tend to be used mostly by less-selective colleges that are not as likely to be a student’s top choice. It’s more than triple that for those applying through early decision, according to the admissions consulting company College Transitions.Įven more colleges offer something called early action, which involves giving applicants an early answer without requiring a commitment to attend. For example, at the University of Pennsylvania, the regular acceptance rate is 5%. In schools with low admission rates, the difference can be significant. This process offers a better chance of being admitted. In exchange, students commit when they apply to attending that school if accepted. About 200 colleges, which tend to be private and highly selective, offer students a chance to file early applications and get a decision from the school by mid-December. That’s good, but the use of another college admissions practice that favors wealthy students has been growing: early decision. In the last couple of years, a handful of schools have dropped legacy admissions and even cut a few sports teams. This created a convenient side door for the 2019 Varsity Blues scandal, in which athletic coaches were bribed to say that certain students were desirable athletes, when they had no such background. Athletic admissions is another area where privileged white applicants have the upper hand - not in the popular sports of football, basketball and soccer, which are widely available to students at most public high schools, but in golf, fencing, equestrian, gymnastics, crew and the like. Those biases include legacy admissions, in which applicants with a close relative who attended the school are given preferential treatment, which also is extended to those whose parents have donated to the school or who have connections to high-ranking college officials. ![]() Not biased toward people of color, but toward people of privilege, most of whom are white. Supreme Court had at least one positive effect: It finally focused attention on the inherently biased system for getting a higher education. The 2023 death of affirmative action in college admissions at the hands of the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |